Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2006 15:48:19 GMT -5
Thank you.
Are any from Cali going to GenCon or what?
|
|
|
Post by synergy on Aug 1, 2006 23:43:33 GMT -5
NE dismissed it? i liked it. i just think the only problem that i noticed was 2 debaines. besides that its flawless for the type.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2006 1:24:32 GMT -5
Wow...thank you for the kind words. I was under a different impression. lol
Regardless, I am the first one to admit (and have to Chris N. many times) that this deck was originally built for a time when the word was that Grimus and Glye ruled the day. Burn seemed the obvious choice to undermine them both. Now we have the hypothetical return of Control Zycon and the infamous and rampant Lady P decks in many forms. While I think this deck can still make modification and "hang", I wouldnt' expect this to be the deck of choice anymore.
Good for me anyhow...I felt cheap using this back then anyway. lol
|
|
|
Post by synergy on Aug 6, 2006 1:17:02 GMT -5
with recent developments i see lots of zycon burn THANKS TO U and lots of LPR. with burn out there peace time isnt as great.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2006 2:17:06 GMT -5
Well I am predicting the return of Peace Time because whether or not it beats LPR, these LPR decks will have to adjust regardless. I usually see burn decks just aim the burn at the Character with Peace Time out, but it all depends if that would be enough...
|
|
|
Post by synergy on Aug 7, 2006 20:18:33 GMT -5
well Q its very hard to beat zycon burn cause it has at least a little more burn and all of their burn will go right for the head. that makes it a battle of burn with peacetime so peacetim cant win. thats why peacetim wil have at leas tsome trouble
|
|