Keith Katsikas
Administrator 
This is about as normal as I feel these days...
Posts: 1,623
|
Post by Keith Katsikas on Jun 13, 2006 10:20:24 GMT -5
188
Illusionary Fighter
Effect
Isolated
Effected Creature becomes Fully Engaged, remains Fully Engaged, and cannot Block so long as Illusionary Fighter remains in Play.
0
3
1
6
6
Chris Seaman
C
|
|
|
|
Post by redshirt on Jun 25, 2006 21:57:02 GMT -5
Can Vorex disengage a creature effected by Illusionary Fighter?
|
|
Janus
MEGA Judge 
You may be deceived if you trust too much, but you will live in torment if you do not trust enough.
Posts: 79
|
Post by Janus on Jun 26, 2006 1:30:28 GMT -5
I would not think that u would be able to disengage the effected creature by any means because I believe that the intention of the card is to have the creature " remains Fully Engaged....so long as Illusionary Fighter remains in Play."
|
|
gambit
MEGA Judge
Do you want to play cards ladies? Moname!
Posts: 16
|
Post by gambit on Jun 26, 2006 1:56:25 GMT -5
I would also have to agree with redshirt on this one. The illusionary effect would have to be removed in order for that creature to be able to be disengaged by any means necessary.
|
|
gambit
MEGA Judge
Do you want to play cards ladies? Moname!
Posts: 16
|
Post by gambit on Jun 26, 2006 2:26:25 GMT -5
I meant to say I agree with Janus. My bad, but much love for Redshirt.  |
|
|
|
Post by shockyakaglye on Jun 26, 2006 4:59:55 GMT -5
i have to dis agree...illusionary fighter is like swarm it does not put a time token or any thing so you could on tap it with vorex..
|
|
|
|
Post by sojomojo on Jun 26, 2006 8:05:07 GMT -5
The card would stay fully engaged and even Vorex wouldn't be able to disengage it. This is due to " remains Fully Engaged" as long as "Illusionary Fighter remains in Play".. You would need to remove the effect or purify it which is almost the same as removing it. Remember effects are continuous until removed.
Sojo out!
|
|
|
|
Post by shockyakaglye on Jun 26, 2006 10:07:39 GMT -5
ohh sorry i thought we were talking about illusionist
|
|
|
|
Post by redshirt on Jun 28, 2006 9:06:33 GMT -5
My initial understanding is that Vorex wouldn't be able to untap the creature, as people have said. However, it is possible to (mis)read the card as meaning, "Effected Creature becomes Fully Engaged. It remains Fully Engaged. It cannot Block so long as Illusionary Fighter remains in Play."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2006 9:23:15 GMT -5
Even by your sentence restructure, it would continue to work the same way. Even the phrase "It remains Fully Engaged" by itself surrounded in periods wouldn't accomplish any deviation to the ruling as it stands. The card is an effect, and it is integral to the power of effects that their influence holds as long as they are in play. It's a stretch to infer against that, and IMO almost any judge would infer the way some people here already have.
|
|
spiller
MEGA Judge
Vice-President
Posts: 467
|
Post by spiller on Jun 28, 2006 10:05:53 GMT -5
I think it is fair to say that creature is locked down unless you find a way to remove Illusionary Fighter.
|
|
Keith Katsikas
Administrator
This is about as normal as I feel these days...
Posts: 1,623
|
Post by Keith Katsikas on Jun 28, 2006 10:31:26 GMT -5
Just want people to know than even though I am not posting responces to these issues, it's not because I am not reading them: it's 'cause y'all have thangs under control heah. =)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2006 16:32:23 GMT -5
Proud to be in serve of the Sithmasters.
|
|
