Lord Zycon

[Keith Katsikas]

004
Lord Zycon
Character
Grand Mage
12
2
1
15
Lord Zycon counts as a wizard.
Wizards under your control gain Fervor and Lord Zycon my Recruit one Wizard per Round without using an Action so long as you Maintain a Guild.
3
3
2
6
0
Don Maitz
CH

[cadrac]

Are, as far as the game is concerned, you and your Character synonymous, and thus, your Character is not "under your control" because your Character is the "you" doing the controlling, so Lord Zycon would not himself gain Fervor, just your other Wizards?

[Keith Katsikas]

No, actually, if you maintaind a guild and your character was Lord Zycon, he would gain ferver as well.

[tirus]

Question.


If a guild is built, he gains ferver and recruits one wizard per round.
But because he has ferver does he recruit two instead of one?

And when do you recruit the wizard? during any main phase? end? either?

[tirus]

did this just get ignored?

[synergy]

well just to clear one thing out when it says he may recruit a wizzard without using an acitioin he means he can put one creature from his hand into play, right? and no u dont get 2 a turn

[tirus]

synergy said:

well just to clear one thing out when it says he may recruit a wizzard without using an acitioin he means he can put one creature from his hand into play, right? and no u dont get 2 a turn

It doesn't say into play. So it's just the basic recruit.

Into play would be sick!

[sojomojo]

Yeah recruit is into your hand. OMG would that be sweet. lol

Sojo out!

[synergy]

from my knowledge zycon wasnt recruiting a wizard from his deck to hand... he was recruitng a wizard from his hand into play.. thats how keith told it to me

[tirus]

synergy said:

from my knowledge zycon wasnt recruiting a wizard from his deck to hand... he was recruitng a wizard from his hand into play.. thats how keith told it to me

but.. why use recruit then? I thought recruit ment to take from the deck?

[synergy]

no... its differnent form a char. a character is recruiting a creature whnen it just plays it. KEITH CLEAR THIS UP

[tirus]

Then why doesn't sutraps say recruit (although his does work a bit differently.)

Also why not use the term hire? Isn't that the term that describes a character bringing a creature into play?

Keith?

[Thrall King]

If he was putting the wizards into play, it would be worded similarly to sutraps, but since it says recruit, it must be a simple deck to hand maneuver.

[cadrac]

synergy said:

no... its differnent form a char. a character is recruiting a creature whnen it just plays it. KEITH CLEAR THIS UP

Tirus is right on this one. A Character putting a Creature into Play as the normal Action taken by any Character is Hiring it, not Recruiting it. The standard definition of Recruit says the Creature should go to hand unless the Ability causing the Recruiting says otherwise.

[Keith Katsikas]

WOW! Blaine... You're killing me! Recruit brings a creature from your deck to your hand. ALWAYS, unless stated otherwise on the card. AND, because this ability is gained when the keep is maintained, he only gains the ability to recruit ONE wizard, not two.